Williams v. Capital Mining, Lumber & Oil Co.
This text of 153 S.W. 43 (Williams v. Capital Mining, Lumber & Oil Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
on Motion to Condemn Record.
In the petition patent No. 36572 isi set np and it is alleged that tbe patent is. filed; therewith as part thereof; but when the. ease was heard in the Circuit Court the patent was not in the record. It was afterwards found by the attorney for the plaintiff .and copied by the clerk in the transcript at 'his request. The case must be tried here on the same record as 'in the Circuit Court. If the copy of the patent was in fact filed with the petition and lost from the record thereafter, it may be supplied by a proceedinig for that -purpose in the Circuit Court, but the clerk was without authority to copy in the transcript a paper not in the record, until the record was supplied. The copy of the patent is stricken from the record.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
153 S.W. 43, 152 Ky. 47, 1913 Ky. LEXIS 608, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-capital-mining-lumber-oil-co-kyctapp-1913.