Williams v. Butler

762 F.2d 73
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedMay 13, 1985
DocketNos. 83-2534, 83-2641
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 762 F.2d 73 (Williams v. Butler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Williams v. Butler, 762 F.2d 73 (8th Cir. 1985).

Opinion

ORDER

The district court’s decision is affirmed by an equally divided court. Chief Judge Lay, and Judges Floyd R. Gibson, Heaney, Bright, and Arnold vote to affirm the district court’s decision. Judges Ross, McMillian, John R. Gibson, Fagg, and Bowman vote to reverse the district court’s decision. Appellee Williams’ request for attorney fees is granted, with the following modification. Because appellee did not prevail on the punitive damages issue, the cost for services rendered will be reduced ten-percent to $8,055.00. The appellee’s request for expenses in the amount of $1,068.79 is granted. Thus, the total award for fees and expenses allowed by the court is $9,123.79.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Woodley v. Town of Nantucket
645 F. Supp. 1365 (D. Massachusetts, 1986)
Williams v. Butler
802 F.2d 296 (Eighth Circuit, 1986)
Praprotnik v. City of St. Louis
798 F.2d 1168 (Eighth Circuit, 1986)
Canada v. City of Pagedale
635 F. Supp. 376 (E.D. Missouri, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
762 F.2d 73, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-butler-ca8-1985.