Williams v. Bronx Municipal Hospital Center

205 A.D.2d 420, 613 N.Y.S.2d 401, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6495
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 23, 1994
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 205 A.D.2d 420 (Williams v. Bronx Municipal Hospital Center) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Williams v. Bronx Municipal Hospital Center, 205 A.D.2d 420, 613 N.Y.S.2d 401, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6495 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Luis A. Gonzalez, J.), entered January 14, 1994, which denied petitioner’s motion to file a late notice of claim pursuant to General Municipal Law § 50-e (5), unanimously reversed, on the law, and the motion granted, without costs.

[421]*421Where the infant petitioner seeks to recover for permanent brain damage due to alleged negligence and medical malpractice committed prior to and at the time of his birth in respondent hospital in 1984, his application to file a late notice of claim should have been granted inasmuch as respondent has been in possession of the child’s medical records since the time of the alleged malpractice and has thus had actual notice of the claim and the underlying facts within the limitation period (see, Matter of Tomlinson v New York City Health & Hosps. Corp., 190 AD2d 806; Matter of Kurz v New York City Health & Hosps. Corp., 174 AD2d 671, 673). It is undisputed that the application was made within the appropriate limitation period as tolled by petitioner’s infancy. Moreover, the fact that petitioner’s mother waited nine years from the birth of her son and five years from the time he was institutionalized before seeking such relief should not be fatal given respondent’s knowledge and the resulting lack of prejudice (see, Chattergoon v New York City Hous. Auth., 197 AD2d 397; Matter of Kurz v New York City Health & Hosps. Corp., supra). Concur—Carro, J. R, Rosenberger, Wallach, Kupferman and Tom, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Caminero v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.
21 A.D.3d 330 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
McMillan v. City of New York
279 A.D.2d 280 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Lewin v. County of Suffolk
239 A.D.2d 345 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
Sayegh v. Health & Hospitals Corp.
233 A.D.2d 206 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
Matarrese v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.
215 A.D.2d 7 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
Spaulding v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.
210 A.D.2d 128 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
205 A.D.2d 420, 613 N.Y.S.2d 401, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6495, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-bronx-municipal-hospital-center-nyappdiv-1994.