Williams v. Brimeyer

122 F.3d 1093, 1997 WL 561431
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided August 8, 1997·No. No. 96-2469NI·Published·Cited by 14 cases

Opinion

ORDER

The motion of appellants for an award of attorneys’ fees and expenses is granted, and we award $4,971 in fees and $308.41 in expenses. The Clerk of this Court is directed to request the Clerk of the District Court to insert this award in the mandate.

[1094]*1094We hold that the Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1996, 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(d)(3), applies to all hours worked in this case after the date of the passage of the Act. This is not a “retroactive” application of the new law. The situation in Jensen v. Clarke, 94 F.3d 1191, 1202-03 (8th Cir.1996), was different. There, all of the hours involved had already been expended. Indeed, the order of the District Court that we were reviewing in Jensen was entered before the enactment of the PLRA.

We further hold that the PLRA, as applied in this manner, is within the power of Congress.

It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Williams v. Brimeyer, 122 F.3d 1093, 1997 WL 561431 (8th Cir. 1997).

122 F.3d 1093 (Williams v. Brimeyer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. One Lot of Personal Property
2004 UT 36 (Utah Supreme Court, 2004)
Jeff Winters v. Assistant Warden John Sissel
167 F.3d 413 (Eighth Circuit, 1999)
Jeff Winters v. John Sissel
Eighth Circuit, 1999
Roberson v. Brassell
29 F. Supp. 2d 346 (S.D. Texas, 1998)
Inmates DC Jail v. Jackson, Delbert C.
158 F.3d 1357 (D.C. Circuit, 1998)
Madrid v. Gomez
150 F.3d 1030 (Ninth Circuit, 1998)