Williams v. Brentwood Wholesale, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Williams v. Brentwood Wholesale, Inc.

261 A.D.2d 470, 688 N.Y.S.2d 894, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4766

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 10, 1999

StatusPublished

This text of 261 A.D.2d 470 (Williams v. Brentwood Wholesale, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Williams v. Brentwood Wholesale, Inc., 261 A.D.2d 470, 688 N.Y.S.2d 894, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4766 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Henry, J.), dated April 6, 1998, which, inter alia, granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment and dismissed the complaint.

Ordered that the order and judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly granted summary judgment to the defendants dismissing the complaint. The plaintiff’s personal injury cause of action is barred by the exclusive remedy provisions of the Workers’ Compensation Law (see, Gonzales v Armac Indus., 81 NY2d 1). Mangano, P. J., Santucci, Krausman, Florio and H. Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Henry, J.), dated April 6, 1998, which, inter alia, granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment and dismissed the complaint.

Ordered that the order and judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly granted summary judgment to the defendants dismissing the complaint. The plaintiff’s personal injury cause of action is barred by the exclusive remedy provisions of the Workers’ Compensation Law (see, Gonzales v Armac Indus., 81 NY2d 1). Mangano, P. J., Santucci, Krausman, Florio and H. Miller, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

261 A.D.2d 470, 688 N.Y.S.2d 894, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4766, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-brentwood-wholesale-inc-nyappdiv-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack