Williams v. Bray

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Williams v. Bray

206 A.D.2d 969, 616 N.Y.S.2d 286

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 15, 1994·Published

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Even assuming that defendants Alfano and Bray met their initial burdens on their motion and cross motion, respectively, for summary judgment seeking dismissal of the complaint on the ground that plaintiff failed to meet the serious injury threshold, plaintiff raised an issue of fact in response thereto by the affirmation of her treating physician (see, Assaf v Ropog Cab Corp., 153 AD2d 520). (Appeals from Order of Supreme Court, Nassau County, DiNoto, J.—Summary Judgment.) Present—Pine, J. P., Lawton, Wesley, Doerr and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Even assuming that defendants Alfano and Bray met their initial burdens on their motion and cross motion, respectively, for summary judgment seeking dismissal of the complaint on the ground that plaintiff failed to meet the serious injury threshold, plaintiff raised an issue of fact in response thereto by the affirmation of her treating physician (see, Assaf v Ropog Cab Corp., 153 AD2d 520). (Appeals from Order of Supreme Court, Nassau County, DiNoto, J.—Summary Judgment.) Present—Pine, J. P., Lawton, Wesley, Doerr and Boehm, JJ.

Williams v. Bray, 206 A.D.2d 969, 616 N.Y.S.2d 286 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

206 A.D.2d 969 (Williams v. Bray) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related