Williams v. Bray

206 A.D.2d 969, 616 N.Y.S.2d 286

This text of 206 A.D.2d 969 (Williams v. Bray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Williams v. Bray, 206 A.D.2d 969, 616 N.Y.S.2d 286 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Even assuming that defendants Alfano and Bray met their initial burdens on their motion and cross motion, respectively, for summary judgment seeking dismissal of the complaint on the ground that plaintiff failed to meet the serious injury threshold, plaintiff raised an issue of fact in response thereto by the affirmation of her treating physician (see, Assaf v Ropog Cab Corp., 153 AD2d 520). (Appeals from Order of Supreme Court, Nassau County, DiNoto, J.—Summary Judgment.) Present—Pine, J. P., Lawton, Wesley, Doerr and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Assaf v. Ropog Cab Corp.
153 A.D.2d 520 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
206 A.D.2d 969, 616 N.Y.S.2d 286, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-bray-nyappdiv-1994.