Williams v. Bray

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Williams v. Bray

193 So. 2d 230

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 21, 1966

DocketNo. 364

StatusPublished

This text of 193 So. 2d 230 (Williams v. Bray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Williams v. Bray, 193 So. 2d 230 (Fla. Ct. App. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The defendant, Nathaniel Williams, appeals an order granting plaintiff, James Bray, a new trial. We have reviewed the briefs and the record and find that the court did not abuse its discretion in granting a new trial. Cloud v. Fallis, Fla.1959, 110 So.2d 669; Collins Fruit Company v. Giglio, Fla.App.1966, 184 So.2d 447. As the granting of a new trial was proper there is no ' need to discuss the remaining points raised on appeal.

Affirmed.

ANDREWS, Acting C. J., WALDEN, J., and TROWBRIDGE, C. PFEIFFER, Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The defendant, Nathaniel Williams, appeals an order granting plaintiff, James Bray, a new trial. We have reviewed the briefs and the record and find that the court did not abuse its discretion in granting a new trial. Cloud v. Fallis, Fla.1959, 110 So.2d 669; Collins Fruit Company v. Giglio, Fla.App.1966, 184 So.2d 447. As the granting of a new trial was proper there is no ' need to discuss the remaining points raised on appeal.

Affirmed.

ANDREWS, Acting C. J., WALDEN, J., and TROWBRIDGE, C. PFEIFFER, Associate Judge, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

193 So. 2d 230, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-bray-fladistctapp-1966.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack