Williams v. Bray

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Williams v. Bray

193 So. 2d 230

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 21, 1966·No. No. 364·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The defendant, Nathaniel Williams, appeals an order granting plaintiff, James Bray, a new trial. We have reviewed the briefs and the record and find that the court did not abuse its discretion in granting a new trial. Cloud v. Fallis, Fla.1959, 110 So.2d 669; Collins Fruit Company v. Giglio, Fla.App.1966, 184 So.2d 447. As the granting of a new trial was proper there is no ' need to discuss the remaining points raised on appeal.

Affirmed.

ANDREWS, Acting C. J., WALDEN, J., and TROWBRIDGE, C. PFEIFFER, Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The defendant, Nathaniel Williams, appeals an order granting plaintiff, James Bray, a new trial. We have reviewed the briefs and the record and find that the court did not abuse its discretion in granting a new trial. Cloud v. Fallis, Fla.1959, 110 So.2d 669; Collins Fruit Company v. Giglio, Fla.App.1966, 184 So.2d 447. As the granting of a new trial was proper there is no ' need to discuss the remaining points raised on appeal.

Affirmed.

ANDREWS, Acting C. J., WALDEN, J., and TROWBRIDGE, C. PFEIFFER, Associate Judge, concur.

Williams v. Bray, 193 So. 2d 230 (Fla. Ct. App. 1966).

Pincite

193 So. 2d 230 (Williams v. Bray) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related