Williams v. Bowden
69 Ala. 433
Opinion
The judgment, which is the foundation of the proceedings in these cases, was rendered on a penalty, and not on a “ debt contracted.” Our constitutional provision, and stat[434] utory exemption, do not embrace sucb a claim as this.' — Meredith, v. Holmes, 68 Ala. 190; Thompson on Homestead, §§380 to 383; Code of 1876, § 2820.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Williams v. Bowden, 69 Ala. 433 (Ala. 1881).
69 Ala. 433 (Williams v. Bowden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Williams v. Newark Dept. of Welfare
129 A.2d 56 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1957)
Jones v. Tarleton
75 So. 643 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1917)
Shelby v. Ziegler
1908 OK 259 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1908)
Betterton v. O'Dwyer
101 S.W. 628 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1907)
Brun v. Mann
151 F. 145 (Eighth Circuit, 1906)
Crawford v. Slaton
133 Ala. 393 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1901)
Ginn v. Hardy
130 Ala. 642 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1900)
Northern v. Hanners
121 Ala. 587 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1898)
McDaniel v. Johnston
110 Ala. 526 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1895)
Dangaix v. Lunsford
112 Ala. 403 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1895)
Penton v. Diamond
92 Ala. 610 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1890)
Stuckey v. McKibbon
92 Ala. 622 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1890)
Schuessler v. Dudley
80 Ala. 547 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1886)
McLaren v. Anderson
81 Ala. 106 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1886)
Vincent v. State
74 Ala. 274 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1883)
State ex rel. Montgomery County v. Allen
71 Ala. 543 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1882)