Williams v. Boswell

255 F. 889, 167 C.C.A. 209, 1919 U.S. App. LEXIS 1542
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 31, 1919
DocketNos. 3281, 3282
StatusPublished

This text of 255 F. 889 (Williams v. Boswell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Williams v. Boswell, 255 F. 889, 167 C.C.A. 209, 1919 U.S. App. LEXIS 1542 (5th Cir. 1919).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The above-entitled cases, involving practically the same issues; were tried and disposed of together in the lower court, and, although brought here separately for review, were, argued and submitted together.

We have considered the records, the briefs submitted, the authorities cited, and the elaborate opinion of the trial judge fully considering and discussing the issues presented.

From our examination, we conclude that the only question raised and necessary for our consideration and decision in these cases is whether the indictments found by the grand jury of the Eastern district of the state of Georgia sufficiently charge the appellants with .a conspiracy to violate the laws of the United States to warrant appellants’ removal from Florida to Georgia for trial.

Under the authorities cited by the trial judge and during the argument of the case, we are fully satisfied that the indictments are sufficient.

The judgments are affirmed in both cases.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
255 F. 889, 167 C.C.A. 209, 1919 U.S. App. LEXIS 1542, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-boswell-ca5-1919.