Williams v. Bodison

Fourth Circuit

Williams v. Bodison

633 F. App'x 190

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 26, 2016·No. No. 15-7667·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: '

Larry Williams appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Williams v. Bodison, No. 2:14-cv-04289-MGL (D.S.C. Sept. 21, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: '

Larry Williams appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Williams v. Bodison, No. 2:14-cv-04289-MGL (D.S.C. Sept. 21, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Williams v. Bodison, 633 F. App'x 190 (4th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

633 F. App'x 190 (Williams v. Bodison) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related