Williams v. Board of Parole

220 A.D.2d 753, 633 N.Y.S.2d 182, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10466
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 30, 1995·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

—In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent Board of Parole dated July 21, 1993, which, after a hearing, denied the petitioner parole, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Leavitt, J.), entered May 25, 1994, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

[754] Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Board of Parole’s consideration of the District Attorney’s negative recommendation concerning the petitioner’s request for parole was not a denial of the petitioner’s due process rights (which do not attach to parole hearings), contrary to law, or a violation of a positive statutory requirement (see, Matter of Russo v New York State Bd. of Parole, 50 NY2d 69; Matter of Briguglio v New York State Bd. of Parole, 24 NY2d 21; People ex rel. Grimmick v McGreevy, 141 AD2d 989; Matter of Lynch v New York State Div. of Parole, 82 AD2d 1012; Executive Law § 259-i [5]). Accordingly, the determination of the Board of Parole is beyond judicial review (see, Correction Law § 212; Matter of Briguglio v New York State Bd. of Parole, supra).

We have considered the petitioner’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Balletta, J. P., Thompson, Ritter and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Williams v. Board of Parole, 220 A.D.2d 753, 633 N.Y.S.2d 182, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10466 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

220 A.D.2d 753 (Williams v. Board of Parole) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Grigger v. New York State Division of Parole
11 A.D.3d 850 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
People v. Palumbo
171 Misc. 2d 734 (New York Supreme Court, 1997)