Williams v. Board of Education

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Williams v. Board of Education

105 A.D.2d 795, 481 N.Y.S.2d 737, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 20913

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 19, 1984

StatusPublished

This text of 105 A.D.2d 795 (Williams v. Board of Education) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Williams v. Board of Education, 105 A.D.2d 795, 481 N.Y.S.2d 737, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 20913 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the chancellor of the respondent board of education sustaining an unsatisfactory rating given petitioner with respect to his duties as head football coach at Curtis High School for the rating period August 19, 1981 through November 30, 1981, petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Shaw, J.), dated September 12, 1983, which dismissed the petition.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

We find that the introduction of certain documents at the hearing of petitioner’s appeal from his unsatisfactory rating did not affect any substantial right of petitioner so as to warrant a new hearing and decision by the chancellor (cf. Matter of Lehman v Board of Educ., 82 AD2d 832, 833-834). Lazer, J. P., Thompson, Niehoff and Rubin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the chancellor of the respondent board of education sustaining an unsatisfactory rating given petitioner with respect to his duties as head football coach at Curtis High School for the rating period August 19, 1981 through November 30, 1981, petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Shaw, J.), dated September 12, 1983, which dismissed the petition.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

We find that the introduction of certain documents at the hearing of petitioner’s appeal from his unsatisfactory rating did not affect any substantial right of petitioner so as to warrant a new hearing and decision by the chancellor (cf. Matter of Lehman v Board of Educ., 82 AD2d 832, 833-834). Lazer, J. P., Thompson, Niehoff and Rubin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

105 A.D.2d 795, 481 N.Y.S.2d 737, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 20913, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-board-of-education-nyappdiv-1984.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack