Williams v. Board of Education
This text of 512 F. App'x 277 (Williams v. Board of Education) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Larry Francis Williams appeals the district court’s order awarding the Defendants summary judgment on his equal protection claim, in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006), race discrimination claim, in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (2006), and defamation claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Williams v. Bd. of Educ. of Wicomico (My., No. 1:10-cv-03582-WMN, 2012 WL 4517745 (D.Md. Oct. 1, 2012). We deny Williams’ motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument be[278]*278cause the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
512 F. App'x 277, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-board-of-education-ca4-2013.