Williams v. Belden

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Williams v. Belden

1 Root 464

DecidedSeptember 15, 1792

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Root 464 (Williams v. Belden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Williams v. Belden, 1 Root 464 (Colo. 1792).

Pincite

Opinion

By the Court.

The rejoinder of the defendant is insufficient.

The statute provides that any persons not being inhabitants in this state, shall have liberty to exhibit their claims against any estate that shall not be represented insolvent, at any time within two years after publication of notice to the creditors, and shall be entitled to payment out of the clear estate that shall remain after payment of those claims that were exhibited within the time limited, and the plaintiff is within the reason of the proviso in the statute.

This judgment was affirmed upon a writ of error in the Supreme Court of Errors.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court.

The rejoinder of the defendant is insufficient.

The statute provides that any persons not being inhabitants in this state, shall have liberty to exhibit their claims against any estate that shall not be represented insolvent, at any time within two years after publication of notice to the creditors, and shall be entitled to payment out of the clear estate that shall remain after payment of those claims that were exhibited within the time limited, and the plaintiff is within the reason of the proviso in the statute.

This judgment was affirmed upon a writ of error in the Supreme Court of Errors.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Root 464, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-belden-conn-1792.