Williams v. Beck
This text of 509 F. App'x 275 (Williams v. Beck) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Stanley Lorenzo Williams appeals the district court’s order denying his Motion for an Order to Reopen the Case to Correct Clerical Mistakes, Errors and to Enter a New Judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, deny Williams’ motions for a transcript at government expense and for appointment of counsel, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
509 F. App'x 275, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-beck-ca4-2013.