Williams v. Bearden

Eighth Circuit

Williams v. Bearden

494 F. App'x 690

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided December 4, 2012·No. No. 12-1793·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Eric Williams appeals the district court’s¹ dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. Having carefully reviewed the record, we conclude that dismissal was proper for the reasons explained by the district court. See Mireles v. Waco, 502 U.S. 9, 112 S.Ct. 286, 116 L.Ed.2d 9 (1991) (per curiam); Burns v. Reed, 500 U.S. 478, 111 S.Ct. 1934, 114 L.Ed.2d 547 (1991); [691] Monell v. Dep’t of Soc. Servs., 436 U.S. 658, 98 S.Ct. 2018, 56 L.Ed.2d 611 (1978). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We also deny the pending motion.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Eric Williams appeals the district court’s¹ dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. Having carefully reviewed the record, we conclude that dismissal was proper for the reasons explained by the district court. See Mireles v. Waco, 502 U.S. 9, 112 S.Ct. 286, 116 L.Ed.2d 9 (1991) (per curiam); Burns v. Reed, 500 U.S. 478, 111 S.Ct. 1934, 114 L.Ed.2d 547 (1991); [691] Monell v. Dep’t of Soc. Servs., 436 U.S. 658, 98 S.Ct. 2018, 56 L.Ed.2d 611 (1978). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We also deny the pending motion.

Footnotes

Williams v. Bearden, 494 F. App'x 690 (8th Cir. 2012).

Pincite

494 F. App'x 690 (Williams v. Bearden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Footnotes

Related