Williams v. Bearden

494 F. App'x 690
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedDecember 4, 2012
DocketNo. 12-1793
StatusPublished

This text of 494 F. App'x 690 (Williams v. Bearden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Williams v. Bearden, 494 F. App'x 690 (8th Cir. 2012).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Eric Williams appeals the district court’s1 dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. Having carefully reviewed the record, we conclude that dismissal was proper for the reasons explained by the district court. See Mireles v. Waco, 502 U.S. 9, 112 S.Ct. 286, 116 L.Ed.2d 9 (1991) (per curiam); Burns v. Reed, 500 U.S. 478, 111 S.Ct. 1934, 114 L.Ed.2d 547 (1991); [691]*691Monell v. Dep’t of Soc. Servs., 436 U.S. 658, 98 S.Ct. 2018, 56 L.Ed.2d 611 (1978). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We also deny the pending motion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.
436 U.S. 658 (Supreme Court, 1978)
Burns v. Reed
500 U.S. 478 (Supreme Court, 1991)
Mireles v. Waco
502 U.S. 9 (Supreme Court, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
494 F. App'x 690, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-bearden-ca8-2012.