Williams v. Bays
Opinion
Kevin R. Williams appeals the district court’s orders accepting the recommendations of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Williams v. Bays, No. 7:07-cv-00019-sgw-mfu, 2007 WL 1553554 (W.D.Va. May 23, 2007; 2007 WL 4553701, Dec. 19, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
274 F. App'x 284 (Williams v. Bays) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.