Williams v. Bays
This text of Williams v. Bays (Williams v. Bays) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-6118
KEVIN R. WILLIAMS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MR. BAYS, Senior Psychologist; DAVID ROBINSON, Chief Warden; MR. HARVEY, Assistant Warden; DR. ASHAN, Psychiatrist; K. DAVID JONES, Psychologist,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (7:07-cv-00019-sgw-mfu)
Submitted: April 17, 2008 Decided: April 24, 2008
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kevin R. Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Rosalie Pemberton Fessier, TIMBERLAKE, SMITH, THOMAS & MOSES, PC, Staunton, Virginia; William W. Muse, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Kevin R. Williams appeals the district court’s orders
accepting the recommendations of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. Williams v. Bays,
No. 7:07-cv-00019-sgw-mfu (W.D. Va. May 23, 2007; Dec. 19, 2007).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Williams v. Bays, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-bays-ca4-2008.