Williams v. Barron Roofing Co.
206 So. 2d 392
Opinion
By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date May 19, 1967.
We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is, therefore, dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.
Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.
The petition is, therefore, denied.
The petition for attorneys’ fees filed by Petitioner is also denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Williams v. Barron Roofing Co., 206 So. 2d 392 (Fla. 1968).
206 So. 2d 392 (Williams v. Barron Roofing Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Outten
206 So. 2d 392 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1968)