Williams v. Bank of Morgan City & Trust Co.

162 So. 266, 1935 La. App. LEXIS 319
CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedJune 14, 1935
DocketNo. 1422.
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 162 So. 266 (Williams v. Bank of Morgan City & Trust Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Williams v. Bank of Morgan City & Trust Co., 162 So. 266, 1935 La. App. LEXIS 319 (La. Ct. App. 1935).

Opinion

EDWARD T. WEEKS, Judge

ad hoc.

This case is similar in facts and as to the principles of law applying thereto, to the case of Watkins v. Bank (La. App.) 162 So. 262, this day decided and the same reasons given in the Watkins Case apply equally here.

Hence, for. the reasons given in the said case of J. S. Wátlcins.v. the same defendant, it is hereby decreed that the judgment appealed from be, and the same is hereby, affirmed; costs in the trial court and also costs 'of appeal are to be paid by plaintiff.'

ELLIOTT, J., dissenting for reasons stated, 162 So. 265. LE BLANC,’J., recused;

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hammond Box Co. v. Tangipahoa Bank & Trust Co.
169 So. 87 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1936)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
162 So. 266, 1935 La. App. LEXIS 319, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-bank-of-morgan-city-trust-co-lactapp-1935.