Williams v. Bank of Morgan City & Trust Co.
162 So. 266, 1935 La. App. LEXIS 319
Opinion
ad hoc.
This case is similar in facts and as to the principles of law applying thereto, to the case of Watkins v. Bank (La. App.) 162 So. 262, this day decided and the same reasons given in the Watkins Case apply equally here.
Hence, for. the reasons given in the said case of J. S. Wátlcins.v. the same defendant, it is hereby decreed that the judgment appealed from be, and the same is hereby, affirmed; costs in the trial court and also costs 'of appeal are to be paid by plaintiff.'
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Williams v. Bank of Morgan City & Trust Co., 162 So. 266, 1935 La. App. LEXIS 319 (La. Ct. App. 1935).
162 So. 266 (Williams v. Bank of Morgan City & Trust Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hammond Box Co. v. Tangipahoa Bank & Trust Co.
169 So. 87 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1936)