Williams v. Auerbach

Supreme Court of Alabama

Williams v. Auerbach

57 Ala. 90

CourtSupreme Court of Alabama

DecidedDecember 15, 1876

StatusPublished

Cited by9 cases

This text of 57 Ala. 90 (Williams v. Auerbach) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Williams v. Auerbach, 57 Ala. 90 (Ala. 1876).

Pincite

Opinion

STONE, J.

Under the uniform rulings of this court, and by the very terms of the statute, we feel constrained to reverse the ruling of the circuit court in this cause. All our ’ decisions hold that a sale of the corpus of the wife’s statutory separate estate is void, unless it be in writing, signed by [92]*92husband and wife, and attested or acknowledged as required by law. — Eevised Code, §§ 2373, 1552; Drake v. Glover, 30 Ala. 382; Whitman v. Abernathy, 33 Ala. 154; Canty v. Sanderford, 37 Ala. 92; Alexander v. Saulsbury, id. 376; Warfield v. Ravesies, 38 Ala. 521.

Eeversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

STONE, J.

Under the uniform rulings of this court, and by the very terms of the statute, we feel constrained to reverse the ruling of the circuit court in this cause. All our ’ decisions hold that a sale of the corpus of the wife’s statutory separate estate is void, unless it be in writing, signed by [92]*92husband and wife, and attested or acknowledged as required by law. — Eevised Code, §§ 2373, 1552; Drake v. Glover, 30 Ala. 382; Whitman v. Abernathy, 33 Ala. 154; Canty v. Sanderford, 37 Ala. 92; Alexander v. Saulsbury, id. 376; Warfield v. Ravesies, 38 Ala. 521.

Eeversed and remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

57 Ala. 90, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-auerbach-ala-1876.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack