Williams v. Arkansas

8 F. App'x 592
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedMay 10, 2001
DocketNo. 00-3324
StatusPublished

This text of 8 F. App'x 592 (Williams v. Arkansas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Williams v. Arkansas, 8 F. App'x 592 (8th Cir. 2001).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Doris Williams, as Guardian of Donald Williams, appeals the district court’s dismissal of Williams’s claim for damages under the Americans with Disabilities Act. We conclude Williams’s claim is foreclosed by the Supreme Court’s decision in Bd. of Trs. of the Univ. of Ala. v. Garrett, 531 U.S. 356, 121 S.Ct. 955, 148 L.Ed.2d 866 (2001), and our decision in Alsbrook v. City of Maumelle, 184 F.3d 999 (8th Cir.1999) (en banc), cert. granted, 528 U.S. 1146, 120 S.Ct. 1003, 145 L.Ed.2d 947, and dismissed, 529 U.S. 1001, 120 S.Ct. 1265, 146 [593]*593L.Ed.2d 215 (2000). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Board of Trustees of Univ. of Ala. v. Garrett
531 U.S. 356 (Supreme Court, 2001)
Alsbrook v. City Of Maumelle
184 F.3d 999 (Eighth Circuit, 1999)
Franklin v. Goodwin
528 U.S. 1145 (Supreme Court, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
8 F. App'x 592, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-arkansas-ca8-2001.