Williams v. Arkansas

Eighth Circuit

Williams v. Arkansas

8 F. App'x 592

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided May 10, 2001·No. No. 00-3324·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Doris Williams, as Guardian of Donald Williams, appeals the district court’s dismissal of Williams’s claim for damages under the Americans with Disabilities Act. We conclude Williams’s claim is foreclosed by the Supreme Court’s decision in Bd. of Trs. of the Univ. of Ala. v. Garrett, 531 U.S. 356, 121 S.Ct. 955, 148 L.Ed.2d 866 (2001), and our decision in Alsbrook v. City of Maumelle, 184 F.3d 999 (8th Cir.1999) (en banc), cert. granted, 528 U.S. 1146, 120 S.Ct. 1003, 145 L.Ed.2d 947, and dismissed, 529 U.S. 1001, 120 S.Ct. 1265, 146 [593] L.Ed.2d 215 (2000). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Doris Williams, as Guardian of Donald Williams, appeals the district court’s dismissal of Williams’s claim for damages under the Americans with Disabilities Act. We conclude Williams’s claim is foreclosed by the Supreme Court’s decision in Bd. of Trs. of the Univ. of Ala. v. Garrett, 531 U.S. 356, 121 S.Ct. 955, 148 L.Ed.2d 866 (2001), and our decision in Alsbrook v. City of Maumelle, 184 F.3d 999 (8th Cir.1999) (en banc), cert. granted, 528 U.S. 1146, 120 S.Ct. 1003, 145 L.Ed.2d 947, and dismissed, 529 U.S. 1001, 120 S.Ct. 1265, 146 [593] L.Ed.2d 215 (2000). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Williams v. Arkansas, 8 F. App'x 592 (8th Cir. 2001).

Pincite

8 F. App'x 592 (Williams v. Arkansas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related