Williams v. Appeals Board of Administrative Adjudication Bureau

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Williams v. Appeals Board of Administrative Adjudication Bureau

2017 NY Slip Op 6654, 153 A.D.3d 1419, 60 N.Y.S.3d 689

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 27, 2017·No. 2015-06969·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the New York State Department of Motor Vehicles Administrative Appeals Board dated December 31, 2013, which affirmed the denial of the petitioner’s application for a new driver license, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Vaughan, J.), dated February 26, 2015, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the petitioner’s contention, the New York State Department of Motor Vehicles (hereinafter the DMV) properly evaluated the petitioner’s June 2013 application for a new driver license pursuant to 15 NYCRR part 136, amended 2012 (see Matter of McKevitt v Fiala, 129 AD3d 730, 730-731 [2015]).

Moreover, the DMV’s determination was not arbitrary, capricious, or an abuse of discretion (see Matter of Arrazola v State of N.Y. Dept. of Motor Vehs., Appeals Bd., 129 AD3d 1444 [2015]).

The petitioner’s remaining contentions are not properly before us, as many of them were raised for the first time in the petition and had not previously been brought to the attention of the DMV (see Matter of Solutions Economics, LLC v Long Is. Power Auth., 97 AD3d 593, 595 [2012]; Matter of Pabon v Phillips, 16 AD3d 589, 590 [2005]), while the rest are improperly raised for the first time on appeal (see Matter of Solutions Economics, LLC v Long Is. Power Auth., 97 AD3d at 595; Matter of Faison v Goord, 298 AD2d 392, 393 [2002]).

Mastro, J.P., Chambers, Miller and Barros, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the New York State Department of Motor Vehicles Administrative Appeals Board dated December 31, 2013, which affirmed the denial of the petitioner’s application for a new driver license, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Vaughan, J.), dated February 26, 2015, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the petitioner’s contention, the New York State Department of Motor Vehicles (hereinafter the DMV) properly evaluated the petitioner’s June 2013 application for a new driver license pursuant to 15 NYCRR part 136, amended 2012 (see Matter of McKevitt v Fiala, 129 AD3d 730, 730-731 [2015]).

Moreover, the DMV’s determination was not arbitrary, capricious, or an abuse of discretion (see Matter of Arrazola v State of N.Y. Dept. of Motor Vehs., Appeals Bd., 129 AD3d 1444 [2015]).

The petitioner’s remaining contentions are not properly before us, as many of them were raised for the first time in the petition and had not previously been brought to the attention of the DMV (see Matter of Solutions Economics, LLC v Long Is. Power Auth., 97 AD3d 593, 595 [2012]; Matter of Pabon v Phillips, 16 AD3d 589, 590 [2005]), while the rest are improperly raised for the first time on appeal (see Matter of Solutions Economics, LLC v Long Is. Power Auth., 97 AD3d at 595; Matter of Faison v Goord, 298 AD2d 392, 393 [2002]).

Mastro, J.P., Chambers, Miller and Barros, JJ., concur.

Williams v. Appeals Board of Administrative Adjudication Bureau, 2017 NY Slip Op 6654, 153 A.D.3d 1419, 60 N.Y.S.3d 689 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

2017 NY Slip Op 6654 (Williams v. Appeals Board of Administrative Adjudication Bureau) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related