Williams v. Angelone

Fourth Circuit

Williams v. Angelone

419 F. App'x 314

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 21, 2011·No. No. 06-6740·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Elton Lee Williams appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his claims under the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000cc to 2000cc-5 (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Williams v. Angelone, No. 7:01-cv-00274-JCT (W.D.Va. filed Mar. 23, 2006 & entered Mar. 24, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Elton Lee Williams appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his claims under the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000cc to 2000cc-5 (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Williams v. Angelone, No. 7:01-cv-00274-JCT (W.D.Va. filed Mar. 23, 2006 & entered Mar. 24, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Williams v. Angelone, 419 F. App'x 314 (4th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

419 F. App'x 314 (Williams v. Angelone) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related