Williams v. Andrew Corp.
This text of 31 F. App'x 491 (Williams v. Andrew Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[492]*492MEMORANDUM
Williams’s need for leave was foreseeable and he did not give the notice required by the California Family Rights Act. See Cal. Gov’t Code § 12945.2(h). Because we affirm the grant of summary judgment against Williams, his request for leave to file a jury demand is moot.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
31 F. App'x 491, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-andrew-corp-ca9-2002.