Williams v. Andrew Corp.
31 F. App'x 491
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided March 5, 2002·No. No. 01-15346; D.C. No. CV-99-00800-GEB(JFM)·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
[492]*492MEMORANDUM
Williams’s need for leave was foreseeable and he did not give the notice required by the California Family Rights Act. See Cal. Gov’t Code § 12945.2(h). Because we affirm the grant of summary judgment against Williams, his request for leave to file a jury demand is moot.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Williams v. Andrew Corp., 31 F. App'x 491 (9th Cir. 2002).
31 F. App'x 491 (Williams v. Andrew Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Kocharov v. JPMorgan Chase Bank NA
D. Arizona, 2024