Williams v. Aldridge

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Williams v. Aldridge

74 S.E. 714, 11 Ga. App. 66, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 258

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedApril 16, 1912

Docket3848

StatusPublished

This text of 74 S.E. 714 (Williams v. Aldridge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Williams v. Aldridge, 74 S.E. 714, 11 Ga. App. 66, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 258 (Ga. Ct. App. 1912).

Pincite

Opinion

Hill, C. J.

1. The instructions to the jury fully, fairly, and accurately presented the issues made by the pleading and evidence, and the assignments of error as to excerpts from the charge, on the ground that the. contentions of the defendant were not correctly stated, are entirely without merit.

[67]*67Decided April 16, 1912.

Complaint; from city court of Baxley — Judge Sellers. April 15, 1911.

W. W. Bennett, for plaintiff in error. Parker & Highsmith, contra

2. This was a suit on promissory notes, and the only issue was one of payment. This issue was fairly presented to the jury in the charge, and the evidence fully supports the verdict in favor of the plaintiff.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI