Williams v. Alameida

527 F.3d 882, 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 11516, 2008 WL 2221007
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedMay 30, 2008
DocketNo. 05-55604
StatusPublished

This text of 527 F.3d 882 (Williams v. Alameida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Williams v. Alameida, 527 F.3d 882, 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 11516, 2008 WL 2221007 (9th Cir. 2008).

Opinion

ORDER

Upon receiving certification that Keith Lee Williams did not submit himself to California state authorities within the 60-day conditional period set forth in Williams v. Alameida, 511 F.3d 973, 974 (9th Cir.2007), we now dismiss Williams’s appeal pursuant to the fugitive disentitlement doctrine. The mandate shall issue forthwith.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Williams v. Alameida
511 F.3d 973 (Ninth Circuit, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
527 F.3d 882, 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 11516, 2008 WL 2221007, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-alameida-ca9-2008.