Williams v. Alamedia
This text of Williams v. Alamedia (Williams v. Alamedia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
KEITH LEE WILLIAMS, No. 05-55604 Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. v. CV-03-00196-NM EDWARD S. ALAMEIDA, Jr., Warden, Central District of Respondent-Appellee. California, Los Angeles
ORDER
Filed May 30, 2008
Before: Kim McLane Wardlaw, Carlos T. Bea, and N. Randy Smith, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
Upon receiving certification that Keith Lee Williams did not submit himself to California state authorities within the 60-day conditional period set forth in Williams v. Alameida, 511 F.3d 973, 974 (9th Cir. 2007), we now dismiss Wil- liams’s appeal pursuant to the fugitive disentitlement doctrine. The mandate shall issue forthwith.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6089 PRINTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS BY THOMSON REUTERS/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO
The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted © 2008 Thomson Reuters/West.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Williams v. Alamedia, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-alamedia-ca9-2008.