Williams v. Alamedia

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

KEITH LEE WILLIAMS,  No. 05-55604 Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No.

v. CV-03-00196-NM EDWARD S. ALAMEIDA, Jr., Warden,  Central District of Respondent-Appellee. California, Los Angeles

 ORDER

Filed May 30, 2008

Before: Kim McLane Wardlaw, Carlos T. Bea, and N. Randy Smith, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

Upon receiving certification that Keith Lee Williams did not submit himself to California state authorities within the 60-day conditional period set forth in Williams v. Alameida, 511 F.3d 973, 974 (9th Cir. 2007), we now dismiss Williams ’s appeal pursuant to the fugitive disentitlement doctrine. The mandate shall issue forthwith.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

PRINTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS BY THOMSON REUTERS/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO

The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted © 2008 Thomson Reuters/West.