Williams v. Alabama Neon Sign Co.
This text of 304 So. 2d 895 (Williams v. Alabama Neon Sign Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The sole question presented on this appeal is whether a wife may maintain an action for loss of her husband’s consortium in Alabama.
The trial court, following Smith v. United Construction Workers, District 50, 271 Ala. 42, 122 So.2d 153, dismissed the action on the ground that the wife had no cause of action. This court overruled Smith, supra, in Swartz v. United States Steel Corporation, 293 Ala. 439, 304 So.2d 881, this day decided. On the authority of Swartz, supra, the judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
304 So. 2d 895, 293 Ala. 454, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-alabama-neon-sign-co-ala-1974.