Williams, Pets. v. City of Phila.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided November 2, 2016·No. 148 EM 2016·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT

LORA JEAN WILLIAMS; GREGORY J. : No. 148 EM 2016 SMITH; CVP MANAGEMENT, INC. D/B/A : OR T/A CITY VIEW PIZZA; JOHN'S : ROAST PORK, INC. F/K/A JOHN'S : ROAST PORK; METRO BEVERAGE OF : PHILADELPHIA, INC. D/B/A OR T/A : METRO BEVERAGE; DAY'S : BEVERAGES, INC. D/B/A OR T/A DAY'S : BEVERAGES; AMERICAN BEVERAGE : ASSOCIATION; PENNSYLVANIA : BEVERAGE ASSOCIATION; : PHILADELPHIA BEVERAGE : ASSOCIATION; AND PENNSYLVANIA : FOOD MERCHANTS ASSOCIATION, :

:

Petitioners :

: :

v. :

: :

CITY OF PHILADELPHIA AND FRANK : BRESLIN, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY : AS COMMISSIONER OF THE : PHILADELPHIA DEPARTMENT OF : REVENUE, :

:

Respondents :

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 2nd day of November, 2016, the Motion for Leave to File a Reply

is GRANTED, and the Application for Extraordinary Relief or the Exercise of King’s

Bench Powers is DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Williams, Pets. v. City of Phila., (Pa. 2016).

Williams, Pets. v. City of Phila. (Williams, Pets. v. City of Phila.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.