Williams (Kelvin) Vs. State
This text of Williams (Kelvin) Vs. State (Williams (Kelvin) Vs. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
KELVIN LEE WILLIAMS, No. 79390 Appellant, vS. THE STATE OF NEVADA, FILED Respondent. AUG 3 0 2019 EUZABETH A. BROWN CLERK OF SUPREME COURT By Š• V c ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL DEPUTY5-4-A(1 CLE1 )
This is a pro se appeal from a purported district court order denying a writ of habeas corpus. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; William D. Kephart, Judge. No decision, oral or written, had been made on the petition when appellant filed his appeal on August 8, 2019. Thus, this appeal is premature. Because appellant failed to designate an appealable order, we lack jurisdiction over this appeal, and we ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.
Parraguirre Cadish
cc: Hon. William D. Kephart, District Judge Kelvin Lee Williams Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney SUPREME COURT Eighth District Court Clerk OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A aggfiZo . 1g -3(oL17?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Williams (Kelvin) Vs. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-kelvin-vs-state-nev-2019.