Williams, Kearayan Quinton

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedApril 17, 2019
DocketWR-89,499-02
StatusPublished

This text of Williams, Kearayan Quinton (Williams, Kearayan Quinton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Williams, Kearayan Quinton, (Tex. 2019).

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-89,499-02

EX PARTE KEARAYAN QUINTON WILLIAMS, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 47259-B IN THE 124TH DISTRICT COURT FROM GREGG COUNTY

Per curiam.

OPINION

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of possession of a

controlled substance and sentenced to two years’ imprisonment. His direct appeal was dismissed for

want of jurisdiction. Williams v. State, 06-18-00190-CR (Tex. App.—Texarkana Nov. 6, 2018)(not

designated for publication).

Applicant contends that he was denied his direct appeal because his appointed appellate

counsel was not timely informed of the appointment and therefore was unable to timely file a notice

of appeal. 2

The trial court has determined that counsel failed to timely file a notice of appeal due to a

breakdown in communication. We find that Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of-

time appeal of the judgment of conviction in Cause No. 47259-B from the 124th District Court of

Gregg County. Applicant is ordered returned to that time at which he may give a written notice of

appeal so that he may then, with the aid of counsel, obtain a meaningful appeal. Within ten days of

the issuance of this opinion, the trial court shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If

Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall immediately

appoint an attorney to represent Applicant on direct appeal. All time limits shall be calculated as if

the sentence had been imposed on the date on which the mandate of this Court issues. We hold that,

should Applicant desire to prosecute an appeal, he must take affirmative steps to file a written notice

of appeal in the trial court within 30 days after the mandate of this Court issues.

Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice-Correctional

Institutions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.

Delivered: April 17, 2019 Do not publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Young
418 S.W.2d 824 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Williams, Kearayan Quinton, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-kearayan-quinton-texcrimapp-2019.