Williams, George v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided February 22, 2013·No. 05-11-01729-CR·Published

Opinion

Order entered February 22, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-11-01729-CR

GEORGE WILLIAMS, Appellant V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 291st Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F08-62218-U

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s pro se motion asking the Court to issue a bench warrant

for him to appear at oral argument in this case. The purpose of oral argument is to “emphasize and clarify the written arguments in the briefs.” TEX. R. APP. P. 39.2. Appellant is represented by counsel and is not entitled to hybrid representation. See Rudd v. State, 616 S.W.2d 623, 625 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1981); see also TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 26.04(j)(2) (West Supp. 2012). The Court DENIES appellant’s motion.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Williams, George v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

Williams, George v. State (Williams, George v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rudd v. State
616 S.W.2d 623 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1981)