Williams' Ex'rs v. Temple

6 Ala. 656
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedJune 15, 1844
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 6 Ala. 656 (Williams' Ex'rs v. Temple) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Williams' Ex'rs v. Temple, 6 Ala. 656 (Ala. 1844).

Opinion

ORMOND, J

The witnesses were clearly incompetent to

testify, from interest in the event of the cause, as is fully shown by the cases cited. If a recovery is had in this case, it will be a fund in the hands of the administrator to pay debts, and thus increase the fund in which they have a distributive share. If it goes against the administratrix, she must pay costs, and thus diminish the fund of which they are distributees. To this effect are the cases of Sims v. Scott, 2 Ala. Rep. 58, and Maury, adm’r v. Mason’s adm’rs, 8 Porter, 211. The last are expressly to the point.

The interest, therefore, was such as from its nature, they could not release.

Let the judgment be reversed, and the cause remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

H. H. Hitt Lumber Co. v. Turner
65 So. 807 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1914)
Ex Parte National Lumber Mfg. Co.
41 So. 10 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1906)
Houston v. Crutchfield's Adm'r
22 Ala. 76 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1853)
Scales v. Desha, Sheppard & Co.
16 Ala. 308 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1849)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
6 Ala. 656, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-exrs-v-temple-ala-1844.