Williams ex rel. Williams v. Winn Dixie Stores, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Williams ex rel. Williams v. Winn Dixie Stores, Inc.

605 So. 2d 186, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 11064, 1992 WL 295432

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 20, 1992

DocketNo. 92-83

StatusPublished

This text of 605 So. 2d 186 (Williams ex rel. Williams v. Winn Dixie Stores, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Williams ex rel. Williams v. Winn Dixie Stores, Inc., 605 So. 2d 186, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 11064, 1992 WL 295432 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

CONFESSION OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

As the appellee, Winn Dixie Stores, Inc., properly concedes, the trial court erred in denying the appellants' motion for a new trial after declaring a mistrial and in granting a directed verdict against the appellants where there was sufficient evidence to raise a jury question. See Yanks v. Barnett, 563 So.2d 776 (Fla.3d DCA 1990), rev. denied, 576 So.2d 295 (Fla.1991); Telesphere Int’l, Inc. v. Scollin, 489 So.2d 1152 (Fla.3d DCA), rev. denied, 500 So.2d 546 (Fla.1986); Daniels v. Weiss, 385 So.2d 661 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); Hernandez v. Motrico, Inc., 370 So.2d 836 (Fla.3d DCA 1979). Based on our disposition of this issue, we do not need to reach the second issue raised on appeal.

Accordingly, the trial judgment under review is reversed and the cause is remanded to the trial court for a new trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CONFESSION OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

As the appellee, Winn Dixie Stores, Inc., properly concedes, the trial court erred in denying the appellants' motion for a new trial after declaring a mistrial and in granting a directed verdict against the appellants where there was sufficient evidence to raise a jury question. See Yanks v. Barnett, 563 So.2d 776 (Fla.3d DCA 1990), rev. denied, 576 So.2d 295 (Fla.1991); Telesphere Int’l, Inc. v. Scollin, 489 So.2d 1152 (Fla.3d DCA), rev. denied, 500 So.2d 546 (Fla.1986); Daniels v. Weiss, 385 So.2d 661 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); Hernandez v. Motrico, Inc., 370 So.2d 836 (Fla.3d DCA 1979). Based on our disposition of this issue, we do not need to reach the second issue raised on appeal.

Accordingly, the trial judgment under review is reversed and the cause is remanded to the trial court for a new trial.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

605 So. 2d 186, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 11064, 1992 WL 295432, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-ex-rel-williams-v-winn-dixie-stores-inc-fladistctapp-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack