Williams ex rel. Williams v. Reed

Eleventh Circuit

Williams ex rel. Williams v. Reed

164 F. App'x 908

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided January 27, 2006·No. No. 05-15417; D.C. Docket No. 04-00838-CV-JEC1·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

In an order entered on August 30, 2005, the district court granted summary judgment in favor of appellees Marion Jackson and John Hammonds and dismissed Appellant’s claim against Montaque Jackson because Appellant had abandoned her claim against him. Appellant now challenges those rulings.

[909] The district court’s August 30 order constitutes a proper application of the controlling law to the material facts in this case. We therefore affirm the court’s judgment.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

In an order entered on August 30, 2005, the district court granted summary judgment in favor of appellees Marion Jackson and John Hammonds and dismissed Appellant’s claim against Montaque Jackson because Appellant had abandoned her claim against him. Appellant now challenges those rulings.

[909] The district court’s August 30 order constitutes a proper application of the controlling law to the material facts in this case. We therefore affirm the court’s judgment.

AFFIRMED.

Williams ex rel. Williams v. Reed, 164 F. App'x 908 (11th Cir. 2006).

Pincite

164 F. App'x 908 (Williams ex rel. Williams v. Reed) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.