Williams ex rel. Williams v. Reed

Eleventh Circuit

Williams ex rel. Williams v. Reed

164 F. App'x 908

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

DecidedJanuary 27, 2006

DocketNo. 05-15417; D.C. Docket No. 04-00838-CV-JEC1

StatusPublished

This text of 164 F. App'x 908 (Williams ex rel. Williams v. Reed) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Williams ex rel. Williams v. Reed, 164 F. App'x 908 (11th Cir. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

In an order entered on August 30, 2005, the district court granted summary judgment in favor of appellees Marion Jackson and John Hammonds and dismissed Appellant’s claim against Montaque Jackson because Appellant had abandoned her claim against him. Appellant now challenges those rulings.

[909]*909The district court’s August 30 order constitutes a proper application of the controlling law to the material facts in this case. We therefore affirm the court’s judgment.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

In an order entered on August 30, 2005, the district court granted summary judgment in favor of appellees Marion Jackson and John Hammonds and dismissed Appellant’s claim against Montaque Jackson because Appellant had abandoned her claim against him. Appellant now challenges those rulings.

[909]*909The district court’s August 30 order constitutes a proper application of the controlling law to the material facts in this case. We therefore affirm the court’s judgment.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

164 F. App'x 908, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-ex-rel-williams-v-reed-ca11-2006.