Williams, David N. v. Aztar Indiana Gaming

Seventh Circuit

Williams, David N. v. Aztar Indiana Gaming

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit·Decided December 5, 2003·No. 03-1822·Published

Opinion

ﬂatten gamers @uurt at Qppeala’

For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604

December 5, 2003

Hon. Joel M. Flaum, Chief Judge Hon. Frank H. Easterbrook, Circuit Judge

Hon. Ann Claire Williams, Circuit Judge

No. 03—1822 David M. Williams, Appeal from the United States District Plaz‘ntifprpellant, Court for the Southern District ofindiana, Evansville Division v.

No. EV Ol—75—C-T/I-l Aztar Indiana Gaming Corporation f/dfb/a Casino Aztar, and Aztar Indiana Gaming John Daniel Tinder, Company, LLC d/b/a Casino Aztar, Judge. Defendants—Appellees.

O R D E R The caption of the court’s Opinion dated December 5, 2003 is amended to reﬂect that

Defendants are Appellecs rather than Appellants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ﬂatten gamers @uurt at Qppeala’

For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604

December 5, 2003

Hon. Joel M. Flaum, Chief Judge Hon. Frank H. Easterbrook, Circuit Judge

Hon. Ann Claire Williams, Circuit Judge

No. 03—1822 David M. Williams, Appeal from the United States District Plaz‘ntifprpellant, Court for the Southern District ofindiana, Evansville Division v.

No. EV Ol—75—C-T/I-l Aztar Indiana Gaming Corporation f/dfb/a Casino Aztar, and Aztar Indiana Gaming John Daniel Tinder, Company, LLC d/b/a Casino Aztar, Judge. Defendants—Appellees.

O R D E R The caption of the court’s Opinion dated December 5, 2003 is amended to reﬂect that

Defendants are Appellecs rather than Appellants.

Williams, David N. v. Aztar Indiana Gaming, (7th Cir. 2003).

Pincite

Williams, David N. v. Aztar Indiana Gaming (Williams, David N. v. Aztar Indiana Gaming) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.