Williams Communications Group, Inc.

315 F. App'x 312
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedMarch 10, 2009
DocketNo. 06-4505-bk
StatusPublished

This text of 315 F. App'x 312 (Williams Communications Group, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Williams Communications Group, Inc., 315 F. App'x 312 (2d Cir. 2009).

Opinion

SUMMARY ORDER

The Supreme Court has long held that “federal courts are without power to decide questions that cannot affect the rights of litigants in the case before them.” North Carolina v. Rice, 404 U.S. 244, 246, 92 S.Ct. 402, 30 L.Ed.2d 413 (1971). As a preliminary matter, we must therefore determine whether there is a live case or [313]*313controversy before us. If the case is moot, then federal courts lack subject matter jurisdiction and must dismiss. Fox v. Bd. of Trustees of the State Univ. of N.Y., 42 F.3d 135, 140 (2d Cir.1994).

The interest that the parties before us had in the instant case depended on their obtaining a judgment in an ongoing securities litigation. The parties, however, have lost in that litigation, and the judgment against them has now been affirmed on appeal. See In re Williams Secs. Litig.— WCG Subclass, 558 F.3d 1130 (10th Cir.2009). As a result, they no longer have an interest in the question before us, and the case is now moot.

Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED as moot.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

North Carolina v. Rice
404 U.S. 244 (Supreme Court, 1971)
In Re Williams Securities Litigation-WCG Subclass
558 F.3d 1130 (Tenth Circuit, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
315 F. App'x 312, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-communications-group-inc-ca2-2009.