Williams & Co. v. Groveville Corp.

255 A.D. 947, 8 N.Y.S.2d 204, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5940
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 2, 1938
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 255 A.D. 947 (Williams & Co. v. Groveville Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Williams & Co. v. Groveville Corp., 255 A.D. 947, 8 N.Y.S.2d 204, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5940 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

Opinion

— Order, so far as appealed from, unanimously reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and the conditions contained in the order stricken out. There is no authority for the allowances made. (Civ. Prac. Act, §§ 1547, 1547-a; Emigrant Industrial Sav. Bank v. Feldblum Realty Corp., 238 App. Div. 231.) The receiver’s only claim under the statute is against the party who moved for the appointment of the receiver. He has no claim against these defendants. Settle order on notice. Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Townley, Dore and Cohn, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

515 East 12th Street Assosiates v. Gentile
160 A.D.2d 187 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
263 West 38th Street Corp. v. Kobrinetz
186 Misc. 412 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1946)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
255 A.D. 947, 8 N.Y.S.2d 204, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5940, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-co-v-groveville-corp-nyappdiv-1938.