Williams & Co. v. Groveville Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Williams & Co. v. Groveville Corp.

255 A.D. 947, 8 N.Y.S.2d 204, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5940

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 2, 1938·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

— Order, so far as appealed from, unanimously reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and the conditions contained in the order stricken out. There is no authority for the allowances made. (Civ. Prac. Act, §§ 1547, 1547-a; Emigrant Industrial Sav. Bank v. Feldblum Realty Corp., 238 App. Div. 231.) The receiver’s only claim under the statute is against the party who moved for the appointment of the receiver. He has no claim against these defendants. Settle order on notice. Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Townley, Dore and Cohn, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Order, so far as appealed from, unanimously reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and the conditions contained in the order stricken out. There is no authority for the allowances made. (Civ. Prac. Act, §§ 1547, 1547-a; Emigrant Industrial Sav. Bank v. Feldblum Realty Corp., 238 App. Div. 231.) The receiver’s only claim under the statute is against the party who moved for the appointment of the receiver. He has no claim against these defendants. Settle order on notice. Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Townley, Dore and Cohn, JJ.

Williams & Co. v. Groveville Corp., 255 A.D. 947, 8 N.Y.S.2d 204, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5940 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

Pincite

255 A.D. 947 (Williams & Co. v. Groveville Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related