Williams & Co. v. Donalson

10 S.E. 1015, 84 Ga. 593
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided March 10, 1890·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Blandford, Justice.

This was a contest between the parties as to a fund in the sheriff’s hands arising from the sale of certain property of a common defendant. The money was awarded to Donalson et al., who represented the oldest judgments. Williams & Co. excepted, and contended that while their mortgage fi. fa. was junior in date to the judgments of Donalson et al., yet the mortgage upon which their fi. fa. was founded was a renewal of mortgages older than those judgments. The record, however, shows that these older mortgages were made to Williams, not to Williams & Co., and that the mortgage to Williams & Co. was a novation. So we think that, under the facts in the record, the court below ruled correctly in awarding the money to the judgments of Donalson et al. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Williams & Co. v. Donalson, 10 S.E. 1015, 84 Ga. 593 (Ga. 1890).

10 S.E. 1015 (Williams & Co. v. Donalson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kelley v. Spivey
185 S.E. 783 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1936)
Chattooga County Bank v. Selman
173 S.E. 465 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1934)