Williams Clarke Co. v. United States
61 Cust. Ct. 642
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Williams Clarke Co. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 62 Cust. Ct. 756 →
United States Customs Court·Decided August 28, 1968·No. No. P68/358; protests 63/10031, etc. (Los Angeles)·Published
Opinion
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of rattan bar stool bases (articles No. 8102, 8107, 9102, 9107), similar in all material respects, except that the bar stool bases are not chairs, to the rattan side chair frames the subject of Hurricane Import Co. and Wheeler & Miller v. United States (58 Cust. Ct. 541, C.D. 3046), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Williams Clarke Co. v. United States, 61 Cust. Ct. 642 (cusc 1968).
61 Cust. Ct. 642 (Williams Clarke Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hurricane Import Co. v. United States
58 Cust. Ct. 541 (U.S. Customs Court, 1967)