Home/Third Circuit/Williams (Barry) v. Petsock (George), Weyandt (Lawrence), Wigton (James A.), Howard (James), Maroney (Robert), Sergeant Tohma, Dr. Snitzer, Dr. Gilberttie, Marrash (Joseph), Boyle (Catherine), Johnson (Vanessa)

Williams (Barry) v. Petsock (George), Weyandt (Lawrence), Wigton (James A.), Howard (James), Maroney (Robert), Sergeant Tohma, Dr. Snitzer, Dr. Gilberttie, Marrash (Joseph), Boyle (Catherine), Johnson (Vanessa)

800 F.2d 1142
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided July 14, 1986·No. 86-3022·Published

Opinion

800 F.2d 1142

Williams (Barry)
v.
Petsock (George), Weyandt (Lawrence), Wigton (James A.),
Howard (James), Maroney (Robert), Sergeant Tohma,
Dr. Snitzer, Dr. Gilberttie, Marrash
(Joseph), Boyle (Catherine),
Johnson (Vanessa)

NO. 86-3022

United States Court of Appeals,
Third Circuit.

JUL 14, 1986

Appeal From: W.D.Pa.,

McCune, J.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Williams (Barry) v. Petsock (George), Weyandt (Lawrence), Wigton (James A.), Howard (James), Maroney (Robert), Sergeant Tohma, Dr. Snitzer, Dr. Gilberttie, Marrash (Joseph), Boyle (Catherine), Johnson (Vanessa), 800 F.2d 1142 (3d Cir. 1986).

800 F.2d 1142 (Williams (Barry) v. Petsock (George), Weyandt (Lawrence), Wigton (James A.), Howard (James), Maroney (Robert), Sergeant Tohma, Dr. Snitzer, Dr. Gilberttie, Marrash (Joseph), Boyle (Catherine), Johnson (Vanessa)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.