Williams, Arthur Lee
Opinion
FROM THE NINTH COURT OF APPEALS
MONTGOMERY COUNTY
Per curiam. KEASLER and HERVEY, JJ., dissent.
ORDER
The petition for discretionary review violates Rule of Appellate Procedure 68.5 because the grounds and reasons for review are longer than 15 pages.
The petition is struck. See Rule of Appellate Procedure 68.6.
The petitioner may redraw the petition. The redrawn petition may be filed in the Court of Criminal Appeals within thirty days after the date of this order.
En banc
Delivered: August 22, 2007.
Do Not Publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Williams, Arthur Lee (Williams, Arthur Lee) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.