Williams, Arthur James

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedSeptember 28, 2016
DocketWR-85,674-01
StatusPublished

This text of Williams, Arthur James (Williams, Arthur James) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Williams, Arthur James, (Tex. 2016).

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-85,674-01

EX PARTE ARTHUR JAMES WILLIAMS, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 1013772-A IN THE 182ND DISTRICT COURT FROM HARRIS COUNTY

Per curiam.

OPINION

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant pleaded guilty to possession of less

than one gram of cocaine, and was sentenced to eight months’ state jail imprisonment. He did not

appeal his conviction.

Applicant contends that his plea was involuntary and that his conviction violates due process

because after he entered his plea, laboratory tests revealed that the evidence in this case contained

no controlled substance. Applicant alleges that he was never advised of the laboratory test results, 2

and alleges that he would not have pleaded guilty to this offense had he known that the evidence did

not support the charge. Although Applicant has discharged his sentence in this case, he alleges that

he is suffering continuing consequences from this conviction sufficient to allow this Court to address

his claims. Ex parte Harrington, 310 S.W.3d 452, 456-57 (Tex. Crim. App. 2010).

The parties have entered agreed findings of fact and conclusions of law, which the trial court

has adopted. The trial court has determined that Applicant is entitled to relief. Ex parte Huerta, 692

S.W.2d 681 (Tex. Crim. App. 1985); Ex parte Mable, 443 S.W.3d 129 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014).

Relief is granted. The judgment in Cause No. 1013772 in the 182nd District Court of Harris County

is set aside, and Applicant is remanded to the custody of the Sheriff of Harris County to answer the

charges as set out in the information. The trial court shall issue any necessary bench warrant within

10 days after the mandate of this Court issues.

Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice–Correctional

Institutions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.

Delivered: September 28, 2016 Do not publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Harrington
310 S.W.3d 452 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2010)
Ex Parte Huerta
692 S.W.2d 681 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1985)
Ex Parte Young
418 S.W.2d 824 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1967)
Mable, Kendrick
443 S.W.3d 129 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Williams, Arthur James, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-arthur-james-texcrimapp-2016.