Williams, Alissia Amanda v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedAugust 11, 2005
Docket14-05-00130-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Williams, Alissia Amanda v. State (Williams, Alissia Amanda v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Williams, Alissia Amanda v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed August 11, 2005

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed August 11, 2005.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-05-00130-CR

ALISSIA AMANDA WILLIAMS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 262nd District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 877,840

M E M O R A N D U M   O P I N I O N

Appellant pled guilty to the offense of aggravated assault.  The trial judge deferred adjudication of guilt and placed appellant on community supervision for ten years.  The State filed a motion to adjudicate guilt.  After a hearing, the trial court found appellant guilty and assessed punishment at confinement in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice for ten years.  Appellant filed a timely written notice of appeal from the judgment adjudicating guilt.


On appeal, appellant challenges the trial court=s admission of hearsay testimony at the hearing on the state=s motion to adjudication appellant=s guilt.  It is well settled that an appellant whose deferred adjudication probation has been revoked and who has been adjudicated guilty of the original charge, may not raise on appeal contentions of error in the adjudication of guilt process.  Connolly v. State, 983 S.W.2d 738, 741 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999); Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. Art. 42.12 ' 5(b) (Vernon Supp. 2004-05).  Appellant may only raise issues that occur after adjudication of guilt.  See Ditto v. State, 988 S.W.2d 236, 238 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999). 

On July 21, 2005, notification was transmitted to the parties of this court=s intention to dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.  Appellant filed no response.

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM

Judgment rendered and Memorandum Opinion filed August 11, 2005.

Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges and Justices Yates and Anderson.

Do Not Publish C Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Connolly v. State
983 S.W.2d 738 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1999)
Ditto v. State
988 S.W.2d 236 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Williams, Alissia Amanda v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-alissia-amanda-v-state-texapp-2005.