William Wood, Jr. v. Louie L. Wainwright
Opinion
This state habeas case was commenced May 2, 1977. Petitioner was granted leave to file IFP. The district court conducted evidentiary hearings, and we agree with that court that hearings were required. Despite petitioner’s request, counsel was not appointed for him, and he represented himself at the hearings. Under Rule 8, 28 U.S.C. foll. § 2254, the court was required to appoint counsel if petitioner qualified under 18 U.S.C. § 3006A(g). Rule 8 is applicable to cases commenced on or after February 11, 1977. Browder v. Director, Department of Corrections, 434 U.S. 257, 265, 98 S.Ct. 556, 561, 54 L.Ed.2d 521, 532 n.9 (1978).
The judgment is REVERSED and the cause REMANDED for hearing with appointed counsel.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
597 F.2d 1054 (William Wood, Jr. v. Louie L. Wainwright) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.