William Wayne Bell v. John Sharp, Comptroller of Public Accounts of the State of Texas

Court of Appeals of Texas

William Wayne Bell v. John Sharp, Comptroller of Public Accounts of the State of Texas

DecidedJuly 17, 1996

Docket03-96-00236-CV

StatusPublished

This text of William Wayne Bell v. John Sharp, Comptroller of Public Accounts of the State of Texas (William Wayne Bell v. John Sharp, Comptroller of Public Accounts of the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

William Wayne Bell v. John Sharp, Comptroller of Public Accounts of the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

CV6-236.Bell

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-96-00236-CV

William Wayne Bell, Appellant

v.

John Sharp, Comptroller of Public Accounts of the State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 250TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 95-01856, HONORABLE PAUL R. DAVIS, JR., JUDGE PRESIDING

PER CURIAM

William Wayne Bell attempted to appeal a final judgment favoring John Sharp, the state comptroller. The transcript was timely received. In reviewing the transcript, the Court noted that Bell's affidavit of inability to pay costs, while timely filed, was defective because it lacked a showing that Bell gave the required two-day notice to the opposing party and the court reporter that he was filing an affidavit of inability to pay costs. See Jones v. Stayman, 747 S.W.2d 369, 370 (Tex. 1987) (notice to opposing party and court reporter gives them opportunity to contest party's affidavit); Tex. R. App. P. 40(a)(3)(b). Bell's defective affidavit of inability to pay costs represents a bona fide attempt to perfect an appeal, and thus, this Court has jurisdiction over the appeal. Linwood v. NCNB Texas, 885 S.W.2d 102, 103 (Tex. 1994).

By letter of April 30, 1996, the clerk of this Court wrote Bell, noted the deficiency in his affidavit, and provided Bell an opportunity to correct the defective affidavit of inability or file a proper perfecting instrument. Grand Prairie Indep. Sch. Dist. v. Southern Parts Imports, Inc., 813 S.W.2d 499, 500 (Tex. 1991); Tex. R. App. P. 83. The Court gave Bell until May 20, 1996, to file with this Court a supplemental transcript containing a proper perfecting instrument. After receiving no response from Bell, on May 29, 1996, the clerk of this Court sent a second letter to Bell informing him that if he did not submit to the Court a supplemental transcript containing a proper perfecting instrument by June 24, 1996, his appeal may be dismissed. See Tex. R. App. P. 60(a)(2).

The time for filing a supplemental transcript containing a proper perfecting instrument has passed with no action by Bell. We dismiss the cause for failure to comply with the requirements of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. Tex. R. App. P. 60(a)(2).

Before Chief Justice Carroll, Justices Aboussie and Kidd

Dismissed

Filed: July 17, 1996

Do Not Publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CV6-236.Bell

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-96-00236-CV

William Wayne Bell, Appellant

v.

John Sharp, Comptroller of Public Accounts of the State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 250TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 95-01856, HONORABLE PAUL R. DAVIS, JR., JUDGE PRESIDING

PER CURIAM

William Wayne Bell attempted to appeal a final judgment favoring John Sharp, the state comptroller. The transcript was timely received. In reviewing the transcript, the Court noted that Bell's affidavit of inability to pay costs, while timely filed, was defective because it lacked a showing that Bell gave the required two-day notice to the opposing party and the court reporter that he was filing an affidavit of inability to pay costs. See Jones v. Stayman, 747 S.W.2d 369, 370 (Tex. 1987) (notice to opposing party and court reporter gives them opportunity to contest party's affidavit); Tex. R. App. P. 40(a)(3)(b). Bell's defective affidavit of inability to pay costs represents a bona fide attempt to perfect an appeal, and thus, this Court has jurisdiction over the appeal. Linwood v. NCNB Texas, 885 S.W.2d 102, 103 (Tex. 1994).

By letter of April 30, 1996, the clerk of this Court wrote Bell, noted the deficiency in his affidavit, and provided Bell an opportunity to correct the defective affidavit of inability or file a proper perfecting instrument. Grand Prairie Indep. Sch. Dist. v. Southern Parts Imports, Inc., 813 S.W.2d 499, 500 (Tex. 1991); Tex. R. App. P. 83. The Court gave Bell until May 20, 1996, to file with this Court a supplemental transcript containing a proper perfecting instrument. After receiving no response from Bell, on May 29, 1996, the clerk of this Court sent a second letter to Bell informing him that if he did not submit to the Court a supplemental transcript containing a proper perfecting instrument by June 24, 1996, his appeal may be dismissed. See Tex. R. App. P. 60(a)(2).

The time for filing a supplemental transcript containing a proper perfecting instrument has passed with no action by Bell. We dismiss the cause for failure to comply with the requirements of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. Tex. R. App. P. 60(a)(2).

Before Chief Justice Carroll, Justices Aboussie and Kidd

Dismissed

Filed: July 17, 1996

Do Not Publish

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

William Wayne Bell v. John Sharp, Comptroller of Public Accounts of the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/william-wayne-bell-v-john-sharp-comptroller-of-pub-texapp-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack