William Vernell Davis v. State
This text of William Vernell Davis v. State (William Vernell Davis v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NO. 07-04-0104-CR
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
AT AMARILLO
PANEL A
JANUARY 4, 2005
______________________________
WILLIAM VERNELL DAVIS, APPELLANT
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE
_________________________________
FROM THE 108TH DISTRICT COURT OF POTTER COUNTY;
NO. 48,278-E; HONORABLE ABE LOPEZ, JUDGE
_______________________________
Before JOHNSON, C.J., and REAVIS and CAMPBELL, JJ.
ON ABATEMENT AND REMAND
Following his plea of not guilty, appellant William Vernell Davis was convicted by a
jury of evading arrest with a vehicle, enhanced, and punishment was assessed at 10 years
confinement. Both the clerk’s record and reporter’s record have been filed. Attorney
William Rivers filed appellant’s brief on July 29, 2004, and the State filed its brief on October 13, 2004. Upon suggestion of death of appellant’s attorney, we now abate this
appeal and remand the cause to the trial court.
Upon remand, the trial court shall immediately cause notice of a hearing to be given
and, thereafter, conduct a hearing to determine the following:
1. whether appellant desires to prosecute this appeal; and 2. whether appellant is indigent and entitled to new appointed counsel.
The trial court shall cause a hearing to be transcribed. Should it be determined that
appellant does want to continue the appeal and is indigent, then the trial court shall also
take such measures as may be necessary to assure appellant effective assistance of
counsel, which measures may include the appointment of new counsel. If new counsel is
appointed, the name, address, telephone number, and state bar number of said counsel
shall be included in the order appointing new counsel. The trial court shall execute findings
of fact, conclusions of law, and such orders as the court may enter regarding the
aforementioned issues, and cause its findings and conclusions to be included in a
supplemental clerk's record. A supplemental record of the hearing shall also be included
in the appellate record. Finally, the trial court shall file the supplemental clerk's record and
supplemental reporter's record with the Clerk of this Court by Friday, February 4, 2005.
Should new counsel be appointed, the Clerk of the Court is instructed to accept and
file any brief or supplemental brief newly appointed counsel desires to file. Absent a motion
for extension of time, new counsel’s brief(s) shall be due within 30 days after filing of the
supplemental clerk’s and reporter’s records. The State’s brief will be due within 60 days
-2- following filing of the supplemental clerk’s and reporter’s records or within 30 days following
the filing of new counsel’s brief(s), whichever is later. Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a) & (b).
It is so ordered.
Per Curiam
Do not publish.
-3-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
William Vernell Davis v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/william-vernell-davis-v-state-texapp-2005.