William v. Zandt
This text of 29 F. Cas. 1286 (William v. Zandt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
instructed the jury that if Sirs. Straas had only a distributive share in the slave, her sale could not entitle the petitioner to his freedom; but that if, from the whole evidence, they should find that Mrs. Straas was in possession and exercised acts of ownership, and several of the distributees knew it and did not object, and that Estes never claimed the slave until after the sale, they may presume that she had good title. And the court refused to say that the evidence did not justify such an inference. Verdict for petitioner.
Motion for new trial overruled. Judgment for petitioner.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
29 F. Cas. 1286, 3 Cranch 55, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/william-v-zandt-circtddc-1826.