William v. State
89 So. 927, 18 Ala. App. 699
Opinion
The appellant was convicted of grand larceny, the theft of an automobile, and was sentenced to the penitentiary for a term of not less than six nor more than ten years. The bill of exceptions, which purports to set out all of the evidence, does not disclose any objections made or exceptions reserved to the testimony. A consideration of the testimony discloses ample evidence to warrant the conviction of the defendant. There appears to be no reversible error in the record, and the judgment of conviction is affirmed. Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
William v. State, 89 So. 927, 18 Ala. App. 699 (Ala. Ct. App. 1921).
89 So. 927 (William v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.