William v. Murry v. Dr. H. F. Demesquita
This text of 355 F.2d 930 (William v. Murry v. Dr. H. F. Demesquita) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
355 F.2d 930
William V. MURRY, Appellant,
v.
Dr. H. F. DeMESQUITA, Appellee.
No. 22276.
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.
February 9, 1966.
Rehearing Denied April 29, 1966.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi; Sidney Mize, Judge.
William V. Murry, Hattiesburg, Miss., for appellant.
Leonard B. Melvin, Jr., Laurel, Miss., Melvin, Melvin & Melvin, Laurel, Miss., for appellee.
Before GEWIN and COLEMAN, Circuit Judges, and McRAE, District Judge.
PER CURIAM.
Substantial evidence appearing on the record to support the jury's verdict, the judgment below is
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
355 F.2d 930, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/william-v-murry-v-dr-h-f-demesquita-ca5-1966.