William v. Murry v. Dr. H. F. Demesquita

355 F.2d 930

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided April 29, 1966·No. 22276·Published

Opinion

355 F.2d 930

William V. MURRY, Appellant,
v.
Dr. H. F. DeMESQUITA, Appellee.

No. 22276.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

February 9, 1966.

Rehearing Denied April 29, 1966.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi; Sidney Mize, Judge.

William V. Murry, Hattiesburg, Miss., for appellant.

Leonard B. Melvin, Jr., Laurel, Miss., Melvin, Melvin & Melvin, Laurel, Miss., for appellee.

Before GEWIN and COLEMAN, Circuit Judges, and McRAE, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Substantial evidence appearing on the record to support the jury's verdict, the judgment below is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

355 F.2d 930

William V. MURRY, Appellant,
v.
Dr. H. F. DeMESQUITA, Appellee.

No. 22276.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

February 9, 1966.

Rehearing Denied April 29, 1966.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi; Sidney Mize, Judge.

William V. Murry, Hattiesburg, Miss., for appellant.

Leonard B. Melvin, Jr., Laurel, Miss., Melvin, Melvin & Melvin, Laurel, Miss., for appellee.

Before GEWIN and COLEMAN, Circuit Judges, and McRAE, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Substantial evidence appearing on the record to support the jury's verdict, the judgment below is

Affirmed.

William v. Murry v. Dr. H. F. Demesquita, 355 F.2d 930 (5th Cir. 1966).

Pincite

355 F.2d 930 (William v. Murry v. Dr. H. F. Demesquita) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.